The Delaware Photographic Society

Events | Competitions | Reflector Online | Member Gallery | Contacts | Home

  The Reflector - Online
   

Jan. 2002



President's Message

Photo FAQs

Article - "Cool Things to Try in the Cold Season"

Photo FAQs

Eric Kissa

Q.:Can the image size in close-up photography be increased by reversing the lens?

A.:
A lens is sometimes reversed in close-up photography (the front of the lens towards the camera) for two reasons: (a) to get a larger image and working distance, and (b) to improve the optical performance. The lenses, other than true macro lenses, are designed for making images much smaller than the real size of the subject. In macrophotography the image on film is larger than the real size of the subject and the lens should be turned around. Reversing the lens requires two accessories: (a) a reversing ring which screws into the threads on the front of the lens and has a bayonet mount on the other end for attaching the lens to the camera, and (b) a ring for operating the automatic diaphragm of the lens with a double cable release. The second ring can be omitted by manually opening the diaphragm for composing and closing the diaphragm for the exposure.
Reversing the lens changes the distance between optical center of the lens and the film. Firstly, the reversing ring increases this distance. Secondly, with short focal length lenses the distance between the front glass surface and the end of filter threads becomes a significant additional extension and the magnification increases accordingly. With some short focal length lenses (20-24mm) an image larger than life size can be achieved. However, with some long focal length lenses the reversal of the optics may actually decrease the extension and lower the magnification. Another reason for reversing only short focal length lenses is the mechanical stress on the lens. Because the front of the lens has to carry the weight of the lens, the lens reversal technique is suitable mainly for short focal length lenses with a non-rotating front element.

Q.:I am interested in the Nikkor 35mm f/2.0 D AF, but I have seen a lot of reports about problems where the iris blades hung up or simply quit operating. Is this a real issue, and if so, was it ever resolved by Nikon?

A.:Unfortunately, the issue seems to be real. The 35mm f/2.0 D autofocus lens I have used for less than two years has a sticking diaphragm. I mailed it to Nikon. The repair will take one month and cost $ 159, about half of the amount I paid for the new lens. The repaired lens will have only a 6 month warranty. As far as the second part of your question is concerned, Nikon has told me that this lens has no unusual problems and is well liked by the customers.
The manual focus 35mm f/2.0 Nikkor was a reliable lens popular with photojournalists for its focal length and optical performance.


--------------------------------------
Send questions concerning photographic equipment (cameras, lenses, accessories, filters), photographic techniques (other than digital), and film, as well as information on international photographic exhibitions, to: ekissa @aol.com.


Copyright © 2002 Delaware Camera Club, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All photographic images on this site are copyright © protected. Any unauthorized
use of any image on this site will be considered an infringement
of those copyrights.